Search This Blog

Saturday, May 6, 2017

Book review of "On the Internet: Thinking in Action"

In On the Internet: Thinking in Action,[1] Dreyfus describes learning stages moving from novice, advanced beginner, competence, proficiency, expertise and eventually to mastery. Through the stages, the learner acquires the rules to react to context-free features of a task environment, the maxims to apply to changing situations, and perspectives to determine which elements of a situation may be important and relevant, and assimilates the experience of how his choice of important situational elements resulted in different outcomes to eventually come up with intuitive, automatic reactions to changing situations. Ultimately as a master, the learner selectively risks going beyond his prior empirical knowledge to develop new perspectives and responses that may lead to performance that exceeds conventional expertise. He posits that to move from proficiency to expertise and onward, embodied experience as vulnerable human beings exposed to risky surprises is essential. He further theorizes that since this embodied experience requires the physical presence and “intercorporiality” of a master teacher, who provides feedback, guidance and exemplary behavior to emulate, distance learning through the cyberspace cannot produce expertise or mastery in a learner.
Dreyfus is right to emphasize the importance of a teacher in guiding a learner through the learning stages to reach proficiency, expertise and possibly even beyond. A good teacher may embody the accumulated experience of a culture and society, to impart to the student what choices of responses to a given situation have worked or seem to have worked in the past. Instead of experimenting with thousands of perspectives, the learner may narrow down his choices to a much smaller number and move to become proficient and expert. In addition, if the teacher can demonstrate the expertise and mastery that the learner is eventually going to acquire, the latter can be motivated by seeing the feasibility and benefits and imitate the former.
During his public ministry on earth, Jesus chose 12 among his disciples, called them apostles, and taught them by living with and loving them, teaching them both in public and separately away from the crowd, and sending them out to do the same things that he was doing – that is, preaching about the kingdom of God, driving out evil spirits, and healing people. Jesus embodied the importance of teaching by examples. Apostle Paul likewise was a teacher by examples. He writes to the Corinthian church that his “way of life in Christ Jesus … agrees with what I teach everywhere in every church” (I Cor 4:17, NIV). He lived what he taught and set an example for the church. He could boldly state, “Follow my example, as I follow the example of Christ.” (I Cor 11:1, NIV). Jesus’ warning about a non-exemplary teacher further emphasizes the importance of a good, exemplary teacher. In regards to the hypocritical teachers of the law, who placed heavy burdens on other people’s shoulders while not willing to move a finger themselves, Jesus said, “All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.” (Mat 23:3, KJV).
While distance learning may not provide teaching by examples, the physical presence of teachers may not be as important for certain subject matters. Technical proficiency with automated responses can be achieved via distance learning. For example, the American Heart Association has long taught Advanced Cardiac Life Support through its website modules and simulation as well as in-class teaching. Surgeons have acquired laparoscopic and robotic surgical skills in simulated laboratories with mannequins. Teaching pattern recognition for radiologic and ultrasound studies can be done by programmed instructions on-line just easily as in person. Even foreign languages may be taught through tapes, CD’s, and on-line, though a live teacher may teach cultural nuances better.
Lastly, in a study of the Word of God, where living in accordance with the Word is at least as important as learning the Word, lack of an embodied human teacher in distance learning may not necessarily represent a significant disadvantage. Jesus stated regarding teachers, “But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren” (Mat 23:8, KJV). The revealed truth of the Bible is best taught by the Revealer Himself. After Jesus ascended, He sent the Holy Spirit, who searches the deep things of God (I Cor 2:10) and teaches and reminds them to us (John 14:26). The Holy Spirit can overcome the limitations of on-line teaching and teach us what we need to know in the Word, with or without the presence of an embodied human teacher. The saving ministry of tele-evangelists is a testimony to how the Holy Spirit can work effectively even over a distant medium. Recorded sermons can transcend time and space to transform people’s lives, when the Spirit works in the listening learner. God is effective in empowering transmission of His treasured truth, even when the embodied teachers are only “jars of clay” (II Cor 4:7, NIV).

NB: This was my essay for Orientation Seminar for MABS at RTS in May 2017.





[1] Hubert L. Dreyfus, On the Internet: Thinking in Action. London: Routledge, 2009.